# Cross-view Geo-Localization on University-1652 to SUES-200 Fog-Snow Drone to Satellite

Source: [Cross-view Geo-Localization on University-1652 to SUES-200 Fog-Snow Drone to Satellite](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/cross-view-geo-localization-on-university-1652-to-sues-200-fog-snow-drone-to-satellite>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-16T06:43:01.152Z

Evaluation of Cross-view Geo-localization performance using the combined University-1652 and SUES-200 datasets, specifically focusing on Drone to Satellite matching under Fog and Snow conditions, reporting R@1 and AP.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Cross-view Geo-Localization |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | University-1652 to SUES-200 Fog-Snow Drone to Satellite |
| Metric | R@1 |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [R@1](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/cross-view-geo-localization-on-university-1652-to-sues-200-fog-snow-drone-to-satellite.md?metric=R%401>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/cross-view-geo-localization-on-university-1652-to-sues-200-fog-snow-drone-to-satellite.md?metric=AP>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | R@1 | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GeoLink | 78.34 | Not recorded | 69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6 |
| CV-Cities | 72.33 | Not recorded | 69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6 |
| DAC | 45.03 | Not recorded | 69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6 |
| Sample4Geo | 26.68 | Not recorded | 69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6 |

### GeoLink

R@1: 78.34. Result ID: 69e0845547f34ce924c9268d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CV-Cities

R@1: 72.33. Result ID: 69e0845547f34ce924c9268c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75be1e209131cea69aa9.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/GaoShuang98/CVCities>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DAC

R@1: 45.03. Result ID: 69e0845547f34ce924c9268b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Sample4Geo

R@1: 26.68. Result ID: 69e0845547f34ce924c9268a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cea7d0172140ec7c8e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70781e209131cea4b474.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.