# Counterfactual Sampling on FAIRNESS-XW Regional canonical (test) Source: [Counterfactual Sampling on FAIRNESS-XW Regional canonical (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:41:51.415Z Evaluation of Counterfactual Sampling performance on the test split of the FAIRNESS-XW Regional canonical dataset, measured using ESP and FR. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Counterfactual Sampling | | Dataset (including any stated split) | FAIRNESS-XW Regional canonical (test) | | Metric | ESP | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 15 of 15 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [ESP](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [FR](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | ESP | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | RS | 3 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | RS | 3.8 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | NIS | 9.4 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | CEIS | 10.6 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | NIS | 11.6 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | CEIS | 12.2 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | RS | 15.6 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | NIS | 19.3 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | EXOM\[GMM\] | 23.1 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | EXOM\[MAF\] | 23.7 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | EXOM\[GMM\] | 24.7 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | CEIS | 25.5 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | EXOM\[MAF\] | 26.1 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | EXOM\[MAF\] | 33.9 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | | EXOM\[GMM\] | 35.8 | Not recorded | 68fa76eb1e209131cea6ff0d | ### RS ESP: 3. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0040. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RS ESP: 3.8. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d003b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NIS ESP: 9.4. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0042. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CEIS ESP: 10.6. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0041. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NIS ESP: 11.6. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d003d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CEIS ESP: 12.2. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d003c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RS ESP: 15.6. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0036. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NIS ESP: 19.3. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0038. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EXOM\[GMM\] ESP: 23.1. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0043. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EXOM\[MAF\] ESP: 23.7. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0044. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EXOM\[GMM\] ESP: 24.7. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d003e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CEIS ESP: 25.5. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0037. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EXOM\[MAF\] ESP: 26.1. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d003f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EXOM\[MAF\] ESP: 33.9. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d003a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EXOM\[GMM\] ESP: 35.8. Result ID: 699466f53a6c3148491d0039. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"\|s\|":"1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.