# Counterfactual reasoning on Counterfactual reasoning Agent synthetic (test) Source: [Counterfactual reasoning on Counterfactual reasoning Agent synthetic (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:28:25.584Z Evaluation of model performance on the Counterfactual reasoning task using the test split of the Counterfactual reasoning Agent synthetic dataset, measured by accuracy. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Counterfactual reasoning | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Counterfactual reasoning Agent synthetic (test) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 16 of 16 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | LIME | 99.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | LIME | 99.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | LIME | 94.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | LIME | 92.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SHAP | 64.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | GAM | 63.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | No explanation | 60.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | No explanation | 57.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SHAP | 57.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | GAM | 57.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SHAP | 56.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | GAM | 56 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | No explanation | 55.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | GAM | 53.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SHAP | 52.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | No explanation | 52.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | ### LIME Accuracy: 99.7. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa05. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":1000}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LIME Accuracy: 99.2. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa04. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":100}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LIME Accuracy: 94.5. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa03. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":16}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LIME Accuracy: 92.9. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa02. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":4}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SHAP Accuracy: 64.9. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa09. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":1000}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GAM Accuracy: 63.5. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa0d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":1000}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### No explanation Accuracy: 60.3. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa11. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":1000}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### No explanation Accuracy: 57.9. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa10. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":100}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SHAP Accuracy: 57.3. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa08. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":100}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GAM Accuracy: 57.3. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa0c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":100}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SHAP Accuracy: 56.3. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa06. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":4}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GAM Accuracy: 56. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa0a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":4}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### No explanation Accuracy: 55.6. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa0f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":16}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GAM Accuracy: 53.5. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa0b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":16}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SHAP Accuracy: 52.5. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa07. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":16}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### No explanation Accuracy: 52.1. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa0e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set Size":4}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.