# Concept Matching on Concept Matching Seen

Source: [Concept Matching on Concept Matching Seen](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/concept-matching-on-concept-matching-seen>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-01T07:12:58.054Z

Evaluation of Concept Matching performance on the Concept Matching Seen dataset, reporting standard classification and error rate metrics (Accuracy, F1-score, FPR, FNR) alongside MS.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Concept Matching |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Concept Matching Seen |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/concept-matching-on-concept-matching-seen.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [FPR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/concept-matching-on-concept-matching-seen.md?metric=FPR>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [FNR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/concept-matching-on-concept-matching-seen.md?metric=FNR>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1-score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/concept-matching-on-concept-matching-seen.md?metric=F1-score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [MS](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/concept-matching-on-concept-matching-seen.md?metric=MS>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Concept QuickLook | 97.82 | Not recorded | 68fa76ed1e209131cea6ffb7 |
| Concept Generation | 90.01 | Not recorded | 68fa76ed1e209131cea6ffb7 |
| NNS | 88.34 | Not recorded | 68fa76ed1e209131cea6ffb7 |

### Concept QuickLook

Accuracy: 97.82. Result ID: 69f451b147f34ce924d9c09a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76ed1e209131cea6ffb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76ed1e209131cea6ffb7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Time cost":"1.5 s (±0.2)","By-products":"No","Scalability":"Yes"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Concept Generation

Accuracy: 90.01. Result ID: 69f451b147f34ce924d9c098.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76ed1e209131cea6ffb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c391e209131cea32e4a.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/CompVis/latent-diffusion>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Time cost":"15.0 s (±0.5)","By-products":"Image","Scalability":"No"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NNS

Accuracy: 88.34. Result ID: 69f451b147f34ce924d9c099.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76ed1e209131cea6ffb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64671e209131cea046c9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Time cost":"1.0 s (±0.1)","By-products":"No","Scalability":"No"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.