# Compositionality Modeling on adjective-noun dataset Source: [Compositionality Modeling on adjective-noun dataset]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:52:16.105Z Evaluation of Compositionality Modeling performance on the adjective-noun dataset, typically measured using ranking metrics like Mean Rank and Percent in Top K. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Compositionality Modeling | | Dataset (including any stated split) | adjective-noun dataset | | Metric | Mean Rank | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 4 of 4 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Mean Rank](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Median Rank](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Top-1 Accuracy (%)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Top-10 Accuracy (%)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Top-100 Accuracy (%)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Top-2000 Accuracy (%)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Mean Rank | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Super | 117 | Not recorded | 68fa61611e209131ce9f3d33 | | Comp | 232 | Not recorded | 68fa61611e209131ce9f3d33 | | Super | 3515 | Not recorded | 68fa61611e209131ce9f3d33 | | FilterComp | 3611 | Not recorded | 68fa61611e209131ce9f3d33 | ### Super Mean Rank: 117. Result ID: 698c65ed37894ef7d9ce1657. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of candidates considered":2000}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Comp Mean Rank: 232. Result ID: 698c65ed37894ef7d9ce1656. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of candidates considered":72924}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Super Mean Rank: 3515. Result ID: 698bcc2d7a967eddb7716b26. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of candidates considered":"2000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FilterComp Mean Rank: 3611. Result ID: 698bcc2d7a967eddb7716b25. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of candidates considered":"21,098"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.