# Complex High-Precision Reasoning on LoCoMo (test)

Source: [Complex High-Precision Reasoning on LoCoMo (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/complex-high-precision-reasoning-on-locomo-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:43:29.860Z

Evaluation of model performance on complex, high-precision reasoning tasks using the test split of the LoCoMo dataset, measured using F1 and BLEU-1 scores.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Complex High-Precision Reasoning |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | LoCoMo (test) |
| Metric | F1 Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/complex-high-precision-reasoning-on-locomo-test.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [BLEU-1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/complex-high-precision-reasoning-on-locomo-test.md?metric=BLEU-1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | F1 Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| E-mem | 54.17 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |
| GAM | 45.31 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |
| Mem0 | 45.1 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |
| RAG | 44.73 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |
| MEMORYOS | 42.84 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |
| A-mem | 39.65 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |
| LIGHTMEM | 38.44 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |
| Long-Context | 37.31 | Not recorded | 697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676 |

### E-mem

F1 Score: 54.17. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b25.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"2271","TL":"135","Total Cost":"3621"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GAM

F1 Score: 45.31. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b24.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6925380fd6b0dd334292f41a.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/VectorSpaceLab/general-agentic-memory>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"none","TL":"1254","Total Cost":"12540"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Mem0

F1 Score: 45.1. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b21.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa784b1e209131cea77ad6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"none","TL":"973","Total Cost":"9730"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RAG

F1 Score: 44.73. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b1f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69b91e209131cea23c26.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/master/examples/rag/>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"none","TL":"643","Total Cost":"6430"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MEMORYOS

F1 Score: 42.84. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b22.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa793f1e209131cea7cdc0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"none","TL":"3874","Total Cost":"38740"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### A-mem

F1 Score: 39.65. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b20.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bf31e209131cea8b869.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"none","TL":"2520","Total Cost":"25200"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LIGHTMEM

F1 Score: 38.44. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b23.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c6d1e209131cea8e04d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"none","TL":"612","Total Cost":"6120"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Long-Context

F1 Score: 37.31. Result ID: 6996184c5698665ec4581b1e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b5da8b01e76cc8da676.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"TS":"none","TL":"16910","Total Cost":"169100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.