# Cognitive Task Assessment on Cognitive N-back Task

Source: [Cognitive Task Assessment on Cognitive N-back Task](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/cognitive-task-assessment-on-cognitive-n-back-task>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-15T09:22:41.610Z

Evaluation of model performance on the Cognitive N-back Task dataset, focusing on general Cognitive Task Assessment, reporting Accuracy and F1 scores.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Cognitive Task Assessment |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Cognitive N-back Task |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 9 of 9 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/cognitive-task-assessment-on-cognitive-n-back-task.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/cognitive-task-assessment-on-cognitive-n-back-task.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EEG-MoCE | 62.39 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| EF-Net | 54.41 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| TSMMF | 53.84 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| LMF | 52.71 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| ST2A | 51.28 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| CTMWA | 49.86 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| EFDFNet | 49.15 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| STA-Net | 46.63 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |
| MMML | 45.32 | Not recorded | 69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64 |

### EEG-MoCE

Accuracy: 62.39. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d4a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EF-Net

Accuracy: 54.41. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d49.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TSMMF

Accuracy: 53.84. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d48.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LMF

Accuracy: 52.71. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d47.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa646c1e209131cea049e6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ST2A

Accuracy: 51.28. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d46.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CTMWA

Accuracy: 49.86. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d45.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EFDFNet

Accuracy: 49.15. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d44.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### STA-Net

Accuracy: 46.63. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d43.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MMML

Accuracy: 45.32. Result ID: 69df584647f34ce924c85d42.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bb57d0172140ec7ba64.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73651e209131cea5c2ac.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/zehuiwu/MMML>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"cross-subject 10-fold cross-validation","Number of subjects":"26"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.