# Clustering on Lkm (SIL, ACC, NMI, ARI)

Source: [Clustering on Lkm (SIL, ACC, NMI, ARI)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/clustering-on-lkm-sil-acc-nmi-ari>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-12T08:13:50.377Z

Evaluation of Clustering performance on the Lkm dataset, measured using SIL, ACC, NMI, and ARI.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Clustering |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Lkm |
| Metric | SIL |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [SIL](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/clustering-on-lkm-sil-acc-nmi-ari.md?metric=SIL>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [ACC](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/clustering-on-lkm-sil-acc-nmi-ari.md?metric=ACC>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [NMI](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/clustering-on-lkm-sil-acc-nmi-ari.md?metric=NMI>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [ARI](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/clustering-on-lkm-sil-acc-nmi-ari.md?metric=ARI>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | SIL | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K-Sil | 0.226 | Not recorded | 68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2 |
| k-means | 0.204 | Not recorded | 68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2 |
| OW k-means | 0.198 | Not recorded | 68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2 |
| iLOF k-means | 0.194 | Not recorded | 68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2 |
| LOF k-means | 0.174 | Not recorded | 68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2 |

### K-Sil

SIL: 0.226. Result ID: 69b275566dbb7075b95cee73.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### k-means

SIL: 0.204. Result ID: 69b275566dbb7075b95cee6f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### OW k-means

SIL: 0.198. Result ID: 69b275566dbb7075b95cee72.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### iLOF k-means

SIL: 0.194. Result ID: 69b275566dbb7075b95cee71.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LOF k-means

SIL: 0.174. Result ID: 69b275566dbb7075b95cee70.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79691e209131cea7d7a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.