# Class-conditional sampling on CIFAR-10

Source: [Class-conditional sampling on CIFAR-10](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/class-conditional-sampling-on-cifar-10>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:39:45.014Z

Evaluation of class-conditional sampling performance on the CIFAR-10 dataset, reporting metrics related to sample quality (IS, W2) and conditional accuracy (ACC\_L, ACC\_E).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Class-conditional sampling |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 |
| Metric | Conditional Accuracy (Label) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Conditional Accuracy (Label)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/class-conditional-sampling-on-cifar-10.md?metric=Conditional%20Accuracy%20(Label)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Conditional Accuracy (Example)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/class-conditional-sampling-on-cifar-10.md?metric=Conditional%20Accuracy%20(Example)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Inception Score (IS)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/class-conditional-sampling-on-cifar-10.md?metric=Inception%20Score%20(IS)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [W2 Distance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/class-conditional-sampling-on-cifar-10.md?metric=W2%20Distance>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Conditional Accuracy (Label) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FLOWCHEF | 98.04 | Not recorded | 6992a4769ebc499c97406bf0 |
| Nested TFTF | 92.56 | Not recorded | 6992a4769ebc499c97406bf0 |
| FMPS | 33.81 | Not recorded | 6992a4769ebc499c97406bf0 |

### FLOWCHEF

Conditional Accuracy (Label): 98.04. Result ID: 699a5fad5698665ec4e79f8f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6992a4769ebc499c97406bf0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Nested TFTF

Conditional Accuracy (Label): 92.56. Result ID: 699a5fad5698665ec4e79f90.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6992a4769ebc499c97406bf0.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6992a4769ebc499c97406bf0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Algorithm":"2","K":16,"M":1000}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FMPS

Conditional Accuracy (Label): 33.81. Result ID: 699a5fad5698665ec4e79f8e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6992a4769ebc499c97406bf0.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a8b1e209131cea83ceb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.