# Cervical Margin Segmentation on Crown-generated preparations dataset Source: [Cervical Margin Segmentation on Crown-generated preparations dataset]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-06T07:58:34.846Z Evaluation of models performing cervical margin segmentation on the Crown-generated preparations dataset, typically assessed using surface distance metrics such as Hausdorff Distance. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Cervical margin segmentation | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Crown-generated preparations dataset | | Metric | Hausdorff Distance (mm) | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 1 of 1 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Hausdorff Distance (mm)](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Hausdorff Distance (mm) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CrownSegger | 0.545 | Not recorded | 69aa5f692d603e6de3e41760 | ### CrownSegger Hausdorff Distance (mm): 0.545. Result ID: 69aa88856dbb7075b9541562. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.