# Causal Graph Discovery on Asia (8 nodes, 8 edges) Source: [Causal Graph Discovery on Asia (8 nodes, 8 edges)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-06T07:15:01.486Z Evaluation of Causal Graph Discovery methods on the specific small-scale Asia graph configuration defined by 8 nodes and 8 edges, measured using Accuracy, F Score, NPE, and Ratio. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Causal Graph Discovery | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Asia 8 nodes, 8 edges | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 18 of 18 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [F Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [NPE](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Ratio](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | BFS with LLMs | 88 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | BFS with LLMs | 80 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | BFS with LLMs | 80 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | GES | 70 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | GES | 67 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | PC | 55 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | NOTEARS | 50 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | PC | 50 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | DAGMA | 50 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | DAGMA | 50 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | Pairwise | 47 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | NOTEARS | 44 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | NOTEARS | 44 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | Pairwise | 38 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | PC | 33 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | Pairwise | 33 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | GES | 23 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | | DAGMA | 22 | Not recorded | 68fa74351e209131cea60743 | ### BFS with LLMs Accuracy: 88. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab653. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BFS with LLMs Accuracy: 80. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab659. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BFS with LLMs Accuracy: 80. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab65f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"10000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GES Accuracy: 70. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab65a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"10000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GES Accuracy: 67. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab654. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PC Accuracy: 55. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab65b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"10000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NOTEARS Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab650. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PC Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab655. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DAGMA Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab657. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DAGMA Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab65d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"10000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Pairwise Accuracy: 47. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab65e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"10000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NOTEARS Accuracy: 44. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab656. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NOTEARS Accuracy: 44. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab65c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"10000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Pairwise Accuracy: 38. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab658. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PC Accuracy: 33. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab64f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Pairwise Accuracy: 33. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab652. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GES Accuracy: 23. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab64e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DAGMA Accuracy: 22. Result ID: 69d35d0d47f34ce924bab651. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# of Samples":"100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.