# Carotid Plaque Grading on Private Carotid US Images 1.0 (test) Source: [Carotid Plaque Grading on Private Carotid US Images 1.0 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:27:01.533Z Evaluation of carotid plaque grading performance using ultrasound images from the Private Carotid US Images 1.0 dataset (test split). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Carotid plaque grading | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Private Carotid US Images 1.0 (test) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 11 of 11 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Precision (M)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Recall (M)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [F1 Score (M)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Class 1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Class 2)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Class 3)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CVC-RF | 93.25 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | CVC-RF w/o DSAM | 92.2 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | CVC-RF w/o MoE | 91.45 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | CheXFusion | 90.58 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | MVC | 89.36 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | DeepGuide | 88.74 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | ETMC | 88.19 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | CVC-RF w/o CMCL | 87.8 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | Dual-ResNet18 | 86.98 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | Transverse | 85.43 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | | Longitudinal | 82.41 | Not recorded | 68fa79b01e209131cea7ee53 | ### CVC-RF Accuracy: 93.25. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7bf. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Full Model":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CVC-RF w/o DSAM Accuracy: 92.2. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7bd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ablation":"Without Dual-Stream Attention Module (DSAM)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CVC-RF w/o MoE Accuracy: 91.45. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7be. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ablation":"Without Mixture of Experts (MoE)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CheXFusion Accuracy: 90.58. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7bb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MVC Accuracy: 89.36. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7ba. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DeepGuide Accuracy: 88.74. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7b9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ETMC Accuracy: 88.19. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7b8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CVC-RF w/o CMCL Accuracy: 87.8. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7bc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ablation":"Without Contrastive Multi-Class Loss (CMCL)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Dual-ResNet18 Accuracy: 86.98. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7b7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Transverse Accuracy: 85.43. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7b6. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"View":"Transverse"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Longitudinal Accuracy: 82.41. Result ID: 698b58c07a967eddb76dd7b5. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"View":"Longitudinal"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.