# Capacitance Extraction on Synthetic data Mixed nodes (val)

Source: [Capacitance Extraction on Synthetic data Mixed nodes (val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/capacitance-extraction-on-synthetic-data-mixed-nodes-val>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-09T08:13:25.385Z

Evaluation of model performance on the Capacitance Extraction task using the validation split of the Synthetic data Mixed nodes dataset. Metrics reported include Errtot, Ratiotot, Errcp, and Ratiocp.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Capacitance Extraction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Synthetic data Mixed nodes (val) |
| Metric | Total Error |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Total Error](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/capacitance-extraction-on-synthetic-data-mixed-nodes-val.md?metric=Total%20Error>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Total Ratio](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/capacitance-extraction-on-synthetic-data-mixed-nodes-val.md?metric=Total%20Ratio>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Error (cp)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/capacitance-extraction-on-synthetic-data-mixed-nodes-val.md?metric=Error%20(cp)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Ratio (cp)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/capacitance-extraction-on-synthetic-data-mixed-nodes-val.md?metric=Ratio%20(cp)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Total Error | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AttentionCap-L | 0.44 | Not recorded | 6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6 |
| AttentionCap | 0.54 | Not recorded | 6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6 |
| MLP | 15.2 | Not recorded | 6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6 |

### AttentionCap-L

Total Error: 0.44. Result ID: 6a27ca4dfbc373592c246c42.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Param.":"12M","Node":"Mix","#Train Samples":"180 K","Train Time":"1.02 hr","#Test Samples":"30 K","Test Time":"0.66 s","Test FLOPs":"1.89 B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### AttentionCap

Total Error: 0.54. Result ID: 6a27ca4dfbc373592c246c41.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Param.":"4.0M","Node":"Mix","#Train Samples":"180 K","Train Time":"0.68 hr","#Test Samples":"30 K","Test Time":"0.47 s","Test FLOPs":"0.63 B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MLP

Total Error: 15.2. Result ID: 6a27ca4dfbc373592c246c40.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e4290966ade919bf8a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Param.":"9.7M","Node":"Mix","#Train Samples":"180 K","Train Time":"0.52 hr","#Test Samples":"30 K","Test Time":"0.10 s","Test FLOPs":"1.53 B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.