# Brain MRI Quality Classification on ABIDE (5-fold cross val)

Source: [Brain MRI Quality Classification on ABIDE (5-fold cross val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/brain-mri-quality-classification-on-abide-5-fold-cross-val>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-09T07:29:29.427Z

Evaluation of models for classifying the quality of Brain MRI scans using the ABIDE dataset, assessed via 5-fold cross-validation.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Brain MRI Quality Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ABIDE (5-fold cross val) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/brain-mri-quality-classification-on-abide-5-fold-cross-val.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Precision](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/brain-mri-quality-classification-on-abide-5-fold-cross-val.md?metric=Precision>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Recall](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/brain-mri-quality-classification-on-abide-5-fold-cross-val.md?metric=Recall>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1-score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/brain-mri-quality-classification-on-abide-5-fold-cross-val.md?metric=F1-score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DHoGM | 90 | Not recorded | 69ae53fa2d603e6de3e42aa5 |
| MRIQC | 83.75 | Not recorded | 69ae53fa2d603e6de3e42aa5 |

### DHoGM

Accuracy: 90. Result ID: 69ae76056dbb7075b9562e25.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ae53fa2d603e6de3e42aa5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ae53fa2d603e6de3e42aa5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture":"DHoGM","# Parameters":"209"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MRIQC

Accuracy: 83.75. Result ID: 69ae76056dbb7075b9562e26.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ae53fa2d603e6de3e42aa5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture":"SVM+IQM","# Parameters":"–"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.