# Blood cell classification on Blood Cell Images

Source: [Blood cell classification on Blood Cell Images](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/blood-cell-classification-on-blood-cell-images>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-25T08:23:07.631Z

Evaluation of blood cell classification performance on the Blood Cell Images dataset, reporting Accuracy and Macro F1.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Blood cell classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Blood Cell Images |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/blood-cell-classification-on-blood-cell-images.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Macro F1](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/blood-cell-classification-on-blood-cell-images.md?metric=Macro%20F1>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Karaddi et al. | 99.64 | Not recorded | 6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef |
| Islam et al. | 99.12 | Not recorded | 6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef |
| Girdhar et al. | 98.55 | Not recorded | 6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef |
| HQNN | 95.72 | Not recorded | 6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef |
| Classical Matched | 94.29 | Not recorded | 6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef |
| Classical Baseline | 93.75 | Not recorded | 6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef |

### Karaddi et al.

Accuracy: 99.64. Result ID: 6a1406d4fbc373592c0b2481.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Classes":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Islam et al.

Accuracy: 99.12. Result ID: 6a1406d4fbc373592c0b2480.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Classes":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Girdhar et al.

Accuracy: 98.55. Result ID: 6a1406d4fbc373592c0b247f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Classes":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HQNN

Accuracy: 95.72. Result ID: 6a1406d4fbc373592c0b2484.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Classes":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Classical Matched

Accuracy: 94.29. Result ID: 6a1406d4fbc373592c0b2482.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Classes":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Classical Baseline

Accuracy: 93.75. Result ID: 6a1406d4fbc373592c0b2483.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d75b6f71c5ae7dc9e6ef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Classes":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.