# Bimanual Pick-and-Pour on Pick-and-Pour (Simulated)

Source: [Bimanual Pick-and-Pour on Pick-and-Pour (Simulated)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/bimanual-pick-and-pour-on-pick-and-pour-simulated>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-20T08:50:39.061Z

Evaluation of Bimanual Pick-and-Pour performance on the simulated Pick-and-Pour dataset, measured by Success Rate, time efficiency, and path length.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Bimanual Pick-and-Pour |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Pick-and-Pour (Simulated) |
| Metric | Success Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/bimanual-pick-and-pour-on-pick-and-pour-simulated.md?metric=Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Max Time (s)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/bimanual-pick-and-pour-on-pick-and-pour-simulated.md?metric=Max%20Time%20(s)>): Lower is better; unit: TIME.

- [Avg. Time (s)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/bimanual-pick-and-pour-on-pick-and-pour-simulated.md?metric=Avg.%20Time%20(s)>): Lower is better; unit: TIME.

- [Total Length (m)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/bimanual-pick-and-pour-on-pick-and-pour-simulated.md?metric=Total%20Length%20(m)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Success Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GoC-MPC | 10 | Not recorded | 69bcd46f0636e5bf4afc28cc |
| ReKep | 6 | Not recorded | 69bcd46f0636e5bf4afc28cc |

### GoC-MPC

Success Rate: 10. Result ID: 69bd0a5047f34ce924a72d16.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bcd46f0636e5bf4afc28cc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bcd46f0636e5bf4afc28cc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReKep

Success Rate: 6. Result ID: 69bd0a5047f34ce924a72d17.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bcd46f0636e5bf4afc28cc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75b71e209131cea6981b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.