# Automated failure mode detection alignment on RIFT (test)

Source: [Automated failure mode detection alignment on RIFT (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-03T06:23:52.604Z

Evaluation of model alignment robustness on the RIFT test set, specifically measuring performance across various failure modes such as subjectivity, ungroundedness, and hackability.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Automated failure mode detection alignment |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | RIFT (test) |
| Metric | Subjectivity Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Subjectivity Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Subjectivity%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Non-Atomic Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Non-Atomic%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Ungroundedness Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Ungroundedness%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Misaligned/Rigid Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Misaligned%2FRigid%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Missing Criteria Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Missing%20Criteria%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Hackability Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Hackability%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Low Signal Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Low%20Signal%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Redundant Criteria Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/automated-failure-mode-detection-alignment-on-rift-test.md?metric=Redundant%20Criteria%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Subjectivity Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LLMaJ | 86.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb |
| Alignment | 85.4 | Not recorded | 69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb |
| IRR | 84.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb |
| Reward variance | 84.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb |

### LLMaJ

Subjectivity Score: 86.1. Result ID: 69cf5c7b47f34ce924b88aeb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluator":"LLMaJ","Model":"GPT-5.2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Alignment

Subjectivity Score: 85.4. Result ID: 69cf5c7b47f34ce924b88aed.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluator":"Alignment"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### IRR

Subjectivity Score: 84.3. Result ID: 69cf5c7b47f34ce924b88aec.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluator":"IRR"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Reward variance

Subjectivity Score: 84.3. Result ID: 69cf5c7b47f34ce924b88aee.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cf49680636e5bf4afcd8bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluator":"Reward variance","Conditioned Model":"GPT-5.2","Generator Model":"GPT-5 mini","Number of Responses":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
