# Audio Retrieval on Clotho (test) Source: [Audio Retrieval on Clotho (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:59:35.000Z Evaluation of general Audio Retrieval performance on the test split of the Clotho dataset. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Audio Retrieval | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Clotho (test) | | Metric | R@1 | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 2 of 2 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [R@1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | R@1 | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | WAVE 7B | 25.6 | Not recorded | 68fa7ba91e209131cea89bb0 | | Mei et al. (2024) | 21.5 | Not recorded | 68fa7ba91e209131cea89bb0 | ### WAVE 7B R@1: 25.6. Result ID: 699e444d5698665ec401f0ec. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Mei et al. (2024) R@1: 21.5. Result ID: 699e444d5698665ec401f0eb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Reference Type":"Reference Model"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.