# Attribute Matching on CUB 2011 (test)

Source: [Attribute Matching on CUB 2011 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/attribute-matching-on-cub-2011-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:51:39.140Z

Evaluation of Attribute Matching performance on the test split of the CUB 2011 dataset, reporting Matching Accuracy and Jaccard Index.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Attribute Matching |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CUB 2011 (test) |
| Metric | Matching Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Matching Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/attribute-matching-on-cub-2011-test.md?metric=Matching%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Jaccard Index](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/attribute-matching-on-cub-2011-test.md?metric=Jaccard%20Index>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Matching Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CF-CBM | 81 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CF-CBM | 79.85 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM | 39 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM | 36.15 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM^L | 25.81 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM^L | 17.65 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |

### CF-CBM

Matching Accuracy: 81. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c31484913600f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attribute Set Train":"hierarchy","Attribute Set Eval":"example-wise"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CF-CBM

Matching Accuracy: 79.85. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c31484913600c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attribute Set Train":"hierarchy","Attribute Set Eval":"class-wise"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM

Matching Accuracy: 39. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c31484913600a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attribute Set Train":"whole set","Attribute Set Eval":"class-wise"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM

Matching Accuracy: 36.15. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c31484913600d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attribute Set Train":"whole set","Attribute Set Eval":"example-wise"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM^L

Matching Accuracy: 25.81. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c31484913600b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attribute Set Train":"whole set","Attribute Set Eval":"class-wise"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM^L

Matching Accuracy: 17.65. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c31484913600e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attribute Set Train":"whole set","Attribute Set Eval":"example-wise"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
