# Ataxic Gait Detection on CA-Gait 10 (Fold-1)

Source: [Ataxic Gait Detection on CA-Gait 10 (Fold-1)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ataxic-gait-detection-on-ca-gait-10-fold-1>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-23T10:03:59.731Z

Evaluation of Ataxic Gait Detection performance using the CA-Gait dataset, specifically reporting results for Fold 1 of the 10-fold cross-validation setup.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Ataxic Gait Detection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CA-Gait 10 (Fold-1) |
| Metric | Accuracy (Fold-1) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (Fold-1)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ataxic-gait-detection-on-ca-gait-10-fold-1.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Fold-1)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (Fold-1) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AtGCN (l = 7) | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa75781e209131cea682f3 |
| LSTM-based model | 99.8 | Not recorded | 68fa75781e209131cea682f3 |
| AtGCN (l = 5) | 99.7 | Not recorded | 68fa75781e209131cea682f3 |
| Proposed AtGCN (l = 6) | 99.3 | Not recorded | 68fa75781e209131cea682f3 |

### AtGCN (l = 7)

Accuracy (Fold-1): 100. Result ID: 69c10fd247f34ce924a8ff8f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75781e209131cea682f3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75781e209131cea682f3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"l":"7","Parameter Count":"0.770M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LSTM-based model

Accuracy (Fold-1): 99.8. Result ID: 69c10fd247f34ce924a8ff8c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75781e209131cea682f3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### AtGCN (l = 5)

Accuracy (Fold-1): 99.7. Result ID: 69c10fd247f34ce924a8ff8d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75781e209131cea682f3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75781e209131cea682f3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"l":"5","Parameter Count":"0.374M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Proposed AtGCN (l = 6)

Accuracy (Fold-1): 99.3. Result ID: 69c10fd247f34ce924a8ff8e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75781e209131cea682f3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75781e209131cea682f3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"l":"6","Parameter Count":"0.572M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.