# Anomaly Detection on Traffic (test) Source: [Anomaly Detection on Traffic (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:35:33.650Z Evaluation of Anomaly Detection performance on the test split of the Traffic dataset, measured by Average Precision. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Anomaly Detection | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Traffic (test) | | Metric | Average Precision | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Average Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Average Precision | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Appearance-Motion Correspondence CNN | 79.8 | Not recorded | 68fa66351e209131cea0ec71 | | Appearance-Motion Correspondence CNN | 49 | Not recorded | 68fa66351e209131cea0ec71 | | ALOCC D(R(X)) | 23.7 | Not recorded | 68fa66351e209131cea0ec71 | | AEs + global feature | 21.6 | Not recorded | 68fa66351e209131cea0ec71 | | GANomaly | 19.4 | Not recorded | 68fa66351e209131cea0ec71 | | ALOCC D(X) | 18.2 | Not recorded | 68fa66351e209131cea0ec71 | | AEs + local feature | 17.1 | Not recorded | 68fa66351e209131cea0ec71 | ### Appearance-Motion Correspondence CNN Average Precision: 79.8. Result ID: 698cdfba8b517eb4331d55ad. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"variant":"SSIM on appearance stream"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Appearance-Motion Correspondence CNN Average Precision: 49. Result ID: 698cdfba8b517eb4331d55ac. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"variant":"Full model"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ALOCC D(R(X)) Average Precision: 23.7. Result ID: 698cdfba8b517eb4331d55ab. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AEs + global feature Average Precision: 21.6. Result ID: 698cdfba8b517eb4331d55a9. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GANomaly Average Precision: 19.4. Result ID: 698cdfba8b517eb4331d55a7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ALOCC D(X) Average Precision: 18.2. Result ID: 698cdfba8b517eb4331d55aa. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AEs + local feature Average Precision: 17.1. Result ID: 698cdfba8b517eb4331d55a8. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.