# Angle of Attack (AoA) Estimation on Wind tunnel experimental campaign (test)

Source: [Angle of Attack (AoA) Estimation on Wind tunnel experimental campaign (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/angle-of-attack-aoa-estimation-on-wind-tunnel-experimental-campaign-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-25T11:06:11.050Z

Evaluation of model performance for Angle of Attack (AoA) estimation using the test split of the Wind tunnel experimental campaign data, measured using percentage-based error metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Angle of Attack (AoA) Estimation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Wind tunnel experimental campaign (test) |
| Metric | Mean Error (%) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Mean Error (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/angle-of-attack-aoa-estimation-on-wind-tunnel-experimental-campaign-test.md?metric=Mean%20Error%20(%25)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [90th Percentile Error (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/angle-of-attack-aoa-estimation-on-wind-tunnel-experimental-campaign-test.md?metric=90th%20Percentile%20Error%20(%25)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Max Error (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/angle-of-attack-aoa-estimation-on-wind-tunnel-experimental-campaign-test.md?metric=Max%20Error%20(%25)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Mean Error (%) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CNN | 8.25 | Not recorded | 69c36c2c0636e5bf4afc661a |
| CNN | 9.4 | Not recorded | 69c36c2c0636e5bf4afc661a |

### CNN

Mean Error (%): 8.25. Result ID: 69c3c0b747f34ce924ad0403.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c36c2c0636e5bf4afc661a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c36c2c0636e5bf4afc661a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Post-processing":"Moving-Median"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CNN

Mean Error (%): 9.4. Result ID: 69c3c0b747f34ce924ad0402.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c36c2c0636e5bf4afc661a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c36c2c0636e5bf4afc661a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Post-processing":"None"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.