# Anatomical location on Clinical Expert Evaluation set (N=200)

Source: [Anatomical location on Clinical Expert Evaluation set (N=200)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/anatomical-location-on-clinical-expert-evaluation-set-n-200>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-17T08:52:56.435Z

Evaluation of model performance for determining anatomical location using the Clinical Expert Evaluation set (N=200), reporting Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, and F1-Score.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Anatomical location |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Clinical Expert Evaluation set (N=200) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/anatomical-location-on-clinical-expert-evaluation-set-n-200.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Sensitivity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/anatomical-location-on-clinical-expert-evaluation-set-n-200.md?metric=Sensitivity>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Specificity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/anatomical-location-on-clinical-expert-evaluation-set-n-200.md?metric=Specificity>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1-Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/anatomical-location-on-clinical-expert-evaluation-set-n-200.md?metric=F1-Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Teacher | 72.8 | Not recorded | 69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0 |
| Student | 69.5 | Not recorded | 69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0 |
| Clinician | 66 | Not recorded | 69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0 |

### Teacher

Accuracy: 72.8. Result ID: 69b9165a47f34ce924a1c3cd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Student

Accuracy: 69.5. Result ID: 69b9165a47f34ce924a1c3ce.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Clinician

Accuracy: 66. Result ID: 69b9165a47f34ce924a1c3cc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b8dff20636e5bf4afbe8c0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.