# Ambivalence/hesitancy recognition on BAH 10 target subjects, 214 source subjects

Source: [Ambivalence/hesitancy recognition on BAH 10 target subjects, 214 source subjects](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-11T06:42:23.979Z

Evaluation of Ambivalence/hesitancy recognition performance using the BAH dataset, specifically focusing on results segmented across the 10 target subjects out of 214 source subjects.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Ambivalence/hesitancy recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | BAH 10 target subjects, 214 source subjects |
| Metric | Subject 1 Performance |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 9 of 9 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Subject 1 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%201%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 2 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%202%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 3 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%203%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 4 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%204%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 5 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%205%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 6 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%206%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 7 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%207%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 8 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%208%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 9 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%209%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Subject 10 Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Subject%2010%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Average Performance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ambivalence-hesitancy-recognition-on-bah-10-target-subjects-214-source-subjects.md?metric=Average%20Performance>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Subject 1 Performance | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fine-tune | 93.35 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| SFDA-PFT | 69.46 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| DSFDA | 61.24 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| SFIT | 60.15 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| SFDA-IT | 60 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| TPDS | 50.42 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| SHOT | 49.73 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| Source model | 49.71 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |
| NRC | 49.46 | Not recorded | 68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a |

### Fine-tune

Subject 1 Performance: 93.35. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe45.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"Oracle","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SFDA-PFT

Subject 1 Performance: 69.46. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe44.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"SFDA (data-based)","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DSFDA

Subject 1 Performance: 61.24. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe41.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa790b1e209131cea7bd97.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"SFDA (model-based)","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SFIT

Subject 1 Performance: 60.15. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe42.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e91e209131cea24d52.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"SFDA (data-based)","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SFDA-IT

Subject 1 Performance: 60. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe43.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69f31e209131cea25356.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"SFDA (data-based)","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TPDS

Subject 1 Performance: 50.42. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe40.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"SFDA (model-based)","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SHOT

Subject 1 Performance: 49.73. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe3e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a0e1e209131cea25d69.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/tim-learn/SHOT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"SFDA (model-based)","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Source model

Subject 1 Performance: 49.71. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe3d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"Source-only","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NRC

Subject 1 Performance: 49.46. Result ID: 69b10d1e6dbb7075b95abe3f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa91e209131cea8475a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6b521e209131cea2da05.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Albert0147/SFDA_neighbors>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"SFDA (model-based)","Backbone":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
