# Aesthetic rating on Beauvis Star tree med stimulus

Source: [Aesthetic rating on Beauvis Star tree med stimulus](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aesthetic-rating-on-beauvis-star-tree-med-stimulus>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-11T07:05:05.980Z

Evaluation of aesthetic quality based on specific rating dimensions (Enjoyable, Appealing, etc.) using the Beauvis Star tree med stimulus dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Aesthetic rating |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Beauvis Star tree med stimulus |
| Metric | Composite Aesthetic Score |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Composite Aesthetic Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aesthetic-rating-on-beauvis-star-tree-med-stimulus.md?metric=Composite%20Aesthetic%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Enjoyable Rating](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aesthetic-rating-on-beauvis-star-tree-med-stimulus.md?metric=Enjoyable%20Rating>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Likable Rating](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aesthetic-rating-on-beauvis-star-tree-med-stimulus.md?metric=Likable%20Rating>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Pleasing Rating](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aesthetic-rating-on-beauvis-star-tree-med-stimulus.md?metric=Pleasing%20Rating>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Nice Rating](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aesthetic-rating-on-beauvis-star-tree-med-stimulus.md?metric=Nice%20Rating>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Appealing Rating](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aesthetic-rating-on-beauvis-star-tree-med-stimulus.md?metric=Appealing%20Rating>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Composite Aesthetic Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LSLE | 5 | Not recorded | 6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0 |
| LSLE | 4.95 | Not recorded | 6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0 |
| LSLE | 4.62 | Not recorded | 6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0 |
| Baseline | 4.54 | Not recorded | 6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0 |
| Human | 3.82 | Not recorded | 6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0 |

### LSLE

Composite Aesthetic Score: 5. Result ID: 6a2a5e16fbc373592c26f1ad.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Literacy Level":"medium"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LSLE

Composite Aesthetic Score: 4.95. Result ID: 6a2a5e16fbc373592c26f1ac.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Literacy Level":"low"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LSLE

Composite Aesthetic Score: 4.62. Result ID: 6a2a5e16fbc373592c26f1ae.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Literacy Level":"high"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Baseline

Composite Aesthetic Score: 4.54. Result ID: 6a2a5e16fbc373592c26f1af.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Persona":"None"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Human

Composite Aesthetic Score: 3.82. Result ID: 6a2a5e16fbc373592c26f1b0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a28f34b90966ade919c17d0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"Human baseline"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.