# Aerodynamic Coefficient Estimation on Dallara LMP2

Source: [Aerodynamic Coefficient Estimation on Dallara LMP2](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerodynamic-coefficient-estimation-on-dallara-lmp2>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-21T13:36:38.534Z

Evaluation of model performance on estimating key aerodynamic coefficients (Drag Coefficient (Cd) and Lift Coefficient (Cl)) for the Dallara LMP2 vehicle model, measured by percentage error.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Aerodynamic Coefficient Estimation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Dallara LMP2 |
| Metric | Cd Error |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Cd Error](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerodynamic-coefficient-estimation-on-dallara-lmp2.md?metric=Cd%20Error>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Cl Error](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerodynamic-coefficient-estimation-on-dallara-lmp2.md?metric=Cl%20Error>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Cd Error | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GIST | 0.6 | Not recorded | 69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368 |
| GAOT | 0.9 | Not recorded | 69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368 |
| Transolver | 1.2 | Not recorded | 69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368 |
| FNO-based | 4 | Not recorded | 69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368 |

### GIST

Cd Error: 0.6. Result ID: 69e77d2747f34ce924cf7293.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GAOT

Cd Error: 0.9. Result ID: 69e77d2747f34ce924cf7292.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78de1e209131cea7ae77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Transolver

Cd Error: 1.2. Result ID: 69e77d2747f34ce924cf7291.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5bd41e209131ce9cbd98.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FNO-based

Cd Error: 4. Result ID: 69e77d2747f34ce924cf7290.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e7052e7d0172140ec7f368.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa581d1e209131ce9ab45d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
