# Aerial Image Classification on AIDER (test)

Source: [Aerial Image Classification on AIDER (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerial-image-classification-on-aider-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-23T10:34:09.094Z

Evaluation of Aerial Image Classification performance on the test split of the AIDER dataset, measured using F1-score, Precision, Recall, and inference speed (FPS).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Aerial Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | AIDER (test) |
| Metric | F1 Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 12 of 12 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerial-image-classification-on-aider-test.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Precision](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerial-image-classification-on-aider-test.md?metric=Precision>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Recall](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerial-image-classification-on-aider-test.md?metric=Recall>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Inference Speed (FPS)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/aerial-image-classification-on-aider-test.md?metric=Inference%20Speed%20(FPS)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | F1 Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| VeloxNet | 81.57 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| SqueezeNet | 75.25 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| ConvNeXt V2 | 73.94 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| ShuffleNet | 73.45 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| MobileNetV1 | 73.13 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| MobileNetV2 | 72.94 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| EdgeViT | 71.74 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| EfficientNet | 67.6 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| MobileNetV3 | 63.96 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| ConvNeXt | 62.86 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| gMLP | 52.74 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |
| FasterViT | 39.96 | Not recorded | 69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21 |

### VeloxNet

F1 Score: 81.57. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a934a2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"399,366","FLOPs (M)":"461","Size (MB)":"1.52"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SqueezeNet

F1 Score: 75.25. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a9349c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62d91e209131ce9fba68.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/DeepScale/SqueezeNet>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"740,970","FLOPs (M)":"806","Size (MB)":"2.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConvNeXt V2

F1 Score: 73.94. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a934a0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"27,870,341","FLOPs (M)":"4,455","Size (MB)":"106.32"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ShuffleNet

F1 Score: 73.45. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a9349a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"1,258,729","FLOPs (M)":"152","Size (MB)":"4.86"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MobileNetV1

F1 Score: 73.13. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a93497.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa634e1e209131ce9fdf55.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"3,212,101","FLOPs (M)":"588","Size (MB)":"12.34"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MobileNetV2

F1 Score: 72.94. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a93498.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"2,230,277","FLOPs (M)":"326","Size (MB)":"8.64"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EdgeViT

F1 Score: 71.74. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a934a1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"2,856,197","FLOPs (M)":"554","Size (MB)":"10.90"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EfficientNet

F1 Score: 67.6. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a9349b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa684f1e209131cea1b521.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/efficientnet>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"3,812,005","FLOPs (M)":"396","Size (MB)":"14.69"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MobileNetV3

F1 Score: 63.96. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a93499.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"3,660,573","FLOPs (M)":"233","Size (MB)":"14.06"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConvNeXt

F1 Score: 62.86. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a9349f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"27,823,973","FLOPs (M)":"4,455","Size (MB)":"106.14"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### gMLP

F1 Score: 52.74. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a9349d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a101e209131cea25ed6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"19,179,017","FLOPs (M)":"4,443","Size (MB)":"73.16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FasterViT

F1 Score: 39.96. Result ID: 69c1169447f34ce924a9349e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c0c90b0636e5bf4afc3c21.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"3,168,005","FLOPs (M)":"612","Size (MB)":"12.09"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
