# Adversarial Attack Transferability on ImageNet Target: SE154 5000 images (val) Source: [Adversarial Attack Transferability on ImageNet Target: SE154 5000 images (val)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-17T10:57:07.961Z Evaluation of adversarial attack transferability measured on a specific subset (SE154 5000 images) of the ImageNet validation set, reporting Attack Success Rate. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Adversarial Attack Transferability | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Target: SE154 5000 images (val) | | Metric | Attack Success Rate (%) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 15 of 15 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Attack Success Rate (%)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Attack Success Rate (%) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | RFA+SGM | 83.47 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | MFAA+SGM | 77.91 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | RFA+MUP | 77.13 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | RFA | 75.16 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | SIA+SGM | 72.44 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | MFAA+MUP | 69.91 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | MFAA | 67.88 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | SMI-FRSM+SGM | 62.09 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | SIA+MUP | 57.72 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | SIA | 57.24 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | SMI-FRSM+MUP | 53.27 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | SMI-FRSM | 47.96 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | PGD+SGM | 37.86 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | PGD+MUP | 21.17 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | | PGD | 17.76 | Not recorded | 68fa75361e209131cea66753 | ### RFA+SGM Attack Success Rate (%): 83.47. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b884. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Parameter-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MFAA+SGM Attack Success Rate (%): 77.91. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b881. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Feature-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RFA+MUP Attack Success Rate (%): 77.13. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b883. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Parameter-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RFA Attack Success Rate (%): 75.16. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b882. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Parameter-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SIA+SGM Attack Success Rate (%): 72.44. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b87e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Augmentation-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MFAA+MUP Attack Success Rate (%): 69.91. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b880. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Feature-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MFAA Attack Success Rate (%): 67.88. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b87f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Feature-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SMI-FRSM+SGM Attack Success Rate (%): 62.09. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b87b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Gradient-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SIA+MUP Attack Success Rate (%): 57.72. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b87d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Augmentation-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SIA Attack Success Rate (%): 57.24. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b87c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Augmentation-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SMI-FRSM+MUP Attack Success Rate (%): 53.27. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b87a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Gradient-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SMI-FRSM Attack Success Rate (%): 47.96. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b879. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"Gradient-related"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PGD+SGM Attack Success Rate (%): 37.86. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b878. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"White-box"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PGD+MUP Attack Success Rate (%): 21.17. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b877. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"White-box"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PGD Attack Success Rate (%): 17.76. Result ID: 69b9336f47f34ce924a2b876. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"ResNet-50","Attack Category":"White-box"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.