# Adversarial Attack on ImageNet Target: Res-101

Source: [Adversarial Attack on ImageNet Target: Res-101](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/adversarial-attack-on-imagenet-target-res-101>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:35:05.958Z

Evaluation of adversarial attack performance, measured by Success Rate, specifically against the ResNet-101 model on the ImageNet dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Adversarial Attack |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Target: Res-101 |
| Metric | Attack Success Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 16 of 16 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Attack Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/adversarial-attack-on-imagenet-target-res-101.md?metric=Attack%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Attack Success Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 99.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 98.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 98.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 98.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 88.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 85.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 85.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 85 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 83.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 83 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 82.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 81.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 78.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 76 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 75.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 74.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 99.1. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a19.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 98.9. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a16.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 98.6. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a17.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 98.5. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a18.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 88.2. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a15.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 85.3. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a0d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 85.1. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a11.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 85. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a13.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 83.2. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a14.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 83. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a12.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 82.9. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a0b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 81.9. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a0f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 78.3. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a0e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 76. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a0a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 75.9. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a10.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 74.5. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a0c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
