# Adversarial Attack on ImageNet Target: IncRes-v2

Source: [Adversarial Attack on ImageNet Target: IncRes-v2](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/adversarial-attack-on-imagenet-target-incres-v2>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:35:05.941Z

Evaluation of adversarial attack performance on the ImageNet dataset, specifically targeting the Inception-ResNet-v2 model.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Adversarial Attack |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Target: IncRes-v2 |
| Metric | Attack Success Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 16 of 16 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Attack Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/adversarial-attack-on-imagenet-target-incres-v2.md?metric=Attack%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Attack Success Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 99.4 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 99 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 97.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 97 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 89.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 89 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VNI-CT-FGSM | 87.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 86.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 86.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| VMI-CT-FGSM | 86.4 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 83.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 83.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 83.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 82.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| MI-CT-FGSM | 80.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |
| NI-CT-FGSM | 80 | Not recorded | 68fa6a921e209131cea28f77 |

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 99.4. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a04.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 99. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a05.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 97.1. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a02.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 97. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a03.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"IncRes-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 89.2. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a01.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 89. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d29fd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VNI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 87.2. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a09.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 86.7. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d29fb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 86.6. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d29ff.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VMI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 86.4. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a07.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JHL-HUST/VT>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 83.3. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d29fe.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 83.3. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a08.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 83.2. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a06.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Res-101"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 82.5. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d2a00.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 80.6. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d29fa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NI-CT-FGSM

Attack Success Rate: 80. Result ID: 699abf095698665ec44d29fc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fb1e209131cea13685.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Source Model":"Inc-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
