# Active Mapping on Forward & Backward (FB) Average (All Objects)

Source: [Active Mapping on Forward & Backward (FB) Average (All Objects)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/active-mapping-on-forward-and-backward-fb-average-all-objects>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-23T08:58:39.068Z

Evaluation of Active Mapping performance across all objects in the Forward & Backward (FB) simulation average, measured by metrics such as Coverage, Completeness, and AUC.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Active Mapping |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Forward & Backward (FB) Average (All Objects) |
| Metric | Coverage |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Coverage](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/active-mapping-on-forward-and-backward-fb-average-all-objects.md?metric=Coverage>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Completeness (cm)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/active-mapping-on-forward-and-backward-fb-average-all-objects.md?metric=Completeness%20(cm)>): Lower is better; unit: OTHER.

- [AUC](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/active-mapping-on-forward-and-backward-fb-average-all-objects.md?metric=AUC>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Coverage | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Paparazzo | 67.73 | Not recorded | 69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab |
| TO | 62.05 | Not recorded | 69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab |
| RIS | 54.62 | Not recorded | 69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab |
| RW | 50.24 | Not recorded | 69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab |

### Paparazzo

Coverage: 67.73. Result ID: 69e9df2f47f34ce924d12ec4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TO

Coverage: 62.05. Result ID: 69e9df2f47f34ce924d12ec3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RIS

Coverage: 54.62. Result ID: 69e9df2f47f34ce924d12ec2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RW

Coverage: 50.24. Result ID: 69e9df2f47f34ce924d12ec1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bf87d0172140ec812ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.