# 3D SDF Generation on ShapeNet (test)

Source: [3D SDF Generation on ShapeNet (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-sdf-generation-on-shapenet-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-06T08:18:15.864Z

Evaluation of models generating Signed Distance Functions (SDFs) using the test split of the ShapeNet dataset, typically measured using metrics like Chamfer Distance, F-Score, and Boundary error.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | 3D SDF Generation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ShapeNet (test) |
| Metric | Chamfer Distance |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Chamfer Distance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-sdf-generation-on-shapenet-test.md?metric=Chamfer%20Distance>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [F-Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-sdf-generation-on-shapenet-test.md?metric=F-Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Boundary Error](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-sdf-generation-on-shapenet-test.md?metric=Boundary%20Error>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Chamfer Distance | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CFM | 0.048 | Not recorded | 69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f |
| CFM | 0.048 | Not recorded | 69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f |
| FD | 0.101 | Not recorded | 69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f |

### CFM

Chamfer Distance: 0.048. Result ID: 69faf94647f34ce924ddd35b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference steps":"4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CFM

Chamfer Distance: 0.048. Result ID: 69faf94647f34ce924ddd35c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference steps":"10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FD

Chamfer Distance: 0.101. Result ID: 69faf94647f34ce924ddd35d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69facb0bc0f56ed84308a34f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa714b1e209131cea50807.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference steps":"64"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
