# 3D Object Detection on STF clear weather (test)

Source: [3D Object Detection on STF clear weather (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-stf-clear-weather-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:23:02.186Z

Evaluation of 3D Object Detection performance on the test split of the STF clear weather dataset, reporting Average Precision (AP) metrics broken down by distance ranges (e.g., 0-30m, 30-50m, 50-80m).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | 3D Object Detection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | STF clear weather (test) |
| Metric | AP (0-80m) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [AP (0-80m)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-stf-clear-weather-test.md?metric=AP%20(0-80m)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (0-30m)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-stf-clear-weather-test.md?metric=AP%20(0-30m)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (30-50m)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-stf-clear-weather-test.md?metric=AP%20(30-50m)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (50-80m)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-stf-clear-weather-test.md?metric=AP%20(50-80m)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | AP (0-80m) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PV-RCNN | 45.71 | Not recorded | 68fa6cbb1e209131cea35a53 |
| SECOND | 41.75 | Not recorded | 68fa6cbb1e209131cea35a53 |

### PV-RCNN

AP (0-80m): 45.71. Result ID: 698f38f33a6c314849f72d07.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cbb1e209131cea35a53.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cbb1e209131cea35a53.md>)

[Implementation](<https://www.sota2.com/github.com/SysCV/LiDAR_snow_sim>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Simulation method":"Ours-snow+wet"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SECOND

AP (0-80m): 41.75. Result ID: 698f38f33a6c314849f72d08.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cbb1e209131cea35a53.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cbb1e209131cea35a53.md>)

[Implementation](<https://www.sota2.com/github.com/SysCV/LiDAR_snow_sim>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Simulation method":"LISA \[22\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.