# 3D Mitochondria Instance Segmentation on MitoEM ISBI 2021 Challenge (test)

Source: [3D Mitochondria Instance Segmentation on MitoEM ISBI 2021 Challenge (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-mitochondria-instance-segmentation-on-mitoem-isbi-2021-challenge-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:52:54.248Z

Evaluation of 3D Mitochondria Instance Segmentation performance on the test split of the MitoEM ISBI 2021 Challenge, reporting MitoEM-R and MitoEM-H scores.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | 3D Mitochondria Instance Segmentation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | MitoEM ISBI 2021 Challenge (test) |
| Metric | MitoEM-R |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [MitoEM-R](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-mitochondria-instance-segmentation-on-mitoem-isbi-2021-challenge-test.md?metric=MitoEM-R>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [MitoEM-H](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-mitochondria-instance-segmentation-on-mitoem-isbi-2021-challenge-test.md?metric=MitoEM-H>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Average Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-mitochondria-instance-segmentation-on-mitoem-isbi-2021-challenge-test.md?metric=Average%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | MitoEM-R | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Res-UNet | 85.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6c781e209131cea341bb |
| 2nd Place Competitor | 83.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6c781e209131cea341bb |
| 3rd Place Competitor | 83.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6c781e209131cea341bb |
| 4th Place Competitor | 81.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6c781e209131cea341bb |

### Res-UNet

MitoEM-R: 85.1. Result ID: 698f160f3a6c314849f5a861.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c781e209131cea341bb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c781e209131cea341bb.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Limingxing00/MitoEM2021-Challenge>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"pre-processing":"denoising","components":"Res-UNet-R and Res-UNet-H"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### 2nd Place Competitor

MitoEM-R: 83.6. Result ID: 698f160f3a6c314849f5a862.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c781e209131cea341bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### 3rd Place Competitor

MitoEM-R: 83.3. Result ID: 698f160f3a6c314849f5a863.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c781e209131cea341bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### 4th Place Competitor

MitoEM-R: 81.6. Result ID: 698f160f3a6c314849f5a864.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c781e209131cea341bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.