# 3D Human Reconstruction on User Study

Source: [3D Human Reconstruction on User Study](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-human-reconstruction-on-user-study>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:45:59.007Z

Evaluation of 3D Human Reconstruction methods using metrics focused on Geometry Quality, Appearance Quality, and their respective Consistency scores derived from the User Study.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | 3D Human Reconstruction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | User Study |
| Metric | Geometry Quality Score |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Geometry Quality Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-human-reconstruction-on-user-study.md?metric=Geometry%20Quality%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Appearance Quality Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-human-reconstruction-on-user-study.md?metric=Appearance%20Quality%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Geometry Consistency Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-human-reconstruction-on-user-study.md?metric=Geometry%20Consistency%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Appearance Consistency Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-human-reconstruction-on-user-study.md?metric=Appearance%20Consistency%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Geometry Quality Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PSHuman | 4.71 | Not recorded | 68fa77981e209131cea743a7 |
| ECON | 3.72 | Not recorded | 68fa77981e209131cea743a7 |
| SITH | 2.72 | Not recorded | 68fa77981e209131cea743a7 |
| GTA | 2.11 | Not recorded | 68fa77981e209131cea743a7 |
| PaMIR | 1.96 | Not recorded | 68fa77981e209131cea743a7 |
| PIFUHD | 1.55 | Not recorded | 68fa77981e209131cea743a7 |

### PSHuman

Geometry Quality Score: 4.71. Result ID: 699549ac3badfaffe638b4af.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77981e209131cea743a7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77981e209131cea743a7.md>)

[Implementation](<https://penghtyx.github.io/PSHuman>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ECON

Geometry Quality Score: 3.72. Result ID: 699549ac3badfaffe638b4ac.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77981e209131cea743a7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ee71e209131cea42c3e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://www.sota2.com/econ.is.tue.mpg.de>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SITH

Geometry Quality Score: 2.72. Result ID: 699549ac3badfaffe638b4ae.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77981e209131cea743a7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72bd1e209131cea584ca.md>)

[Implementation](<https://ait.ethz.ch/sith>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GTA

Geometry Quality Score: 2.11. Result ID: 699549ac3badfaffe638b4ad.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77981e209131cea743a7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70f31e209131cea4e4d7.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/River-Zhang/GTA>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PaMIR

Geometry Quality Score: 1.96. Result ID: 699549ac3badfaffe638b4ab.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77981e209131cea743a7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68f51e209131cea1f542.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PIFUHD

Geometry Quality Score: 1.55. Result ID: 699549ac3badfaffe638b4aa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77981e209131cea743a7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67551e209131cea1598e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://shunsukesaito.github.io/PIFuHD/>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.