# 2D joint distance estimation on MPII+NZSL (test)

Source: [2D joint distance estimation on MPII+NZSL (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/2d-joint-distance-estimation-on-mpii-plus-nzsl-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:21:09.478Z

Evaluation of 2D joint distance estimation performance on the test split of the combined MPII and NZSL datasets, reporting pixel error metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | 2D joint distance estimation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | MPII+NZSL (test) |
| Metric | 2D Joint Distance (px) |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [2D Joint Distance (px)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/2d-joint-distance-estimation-on-mpii-plus-nzsl-test.md?metric=2D%20Joint%20Distance%20(px)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | 2D Joint Distance (px) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Proposed Method | 18.95 | Not recorded | 68fa65531e209131cea09abd |
| Proposed Method | 20.65 | Not recorded | 68fa65531e209131cea09abd |
| 2D fit | 22.36 | Not recorded | 68fa65531e209131cea09abd |
| Proposed Method | 23.04 | Not recorded | 68fa65531e209131cea09abd |
| Zimmerman et al. | 59.4 | Not recorded | 68fa65531e209131cea09abd |

### Proposed Method

2D Joint Distance (px): 18.95. Result ID: 698ca6df3ce6cd2163e11c6d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"input":"RGB+2D"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Proposed Method

2D Joint Distance (px): 20.65. Result ID: 698ca6df3ce6cd2163e11c6e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"input":"2D"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### 2D fit

2D Joint Distance (px): 22.36. Result ID: 698ca6df3ce6cd2163e11c6f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63d71e209131cea0124f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Proposed Method

2D Joint Distance (px): 23.04. Result ID: 698ca6df3ce6cd2163e11c6c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"input":"RGB"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Zimmerman et al.

2D Joint Distance (px): 59.4. Result ID: 698ca6df3ce6cd2163e11c70.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65531e209131cea09abd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b61e209131cea003d1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
