# 2D Image Editing on User Study 20 source meshes (test) Source: [2D Image Editing on User Study 20 source meshes (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:58:54.577Z Evaluation of 2D Image Editing performance using the 'User Study 20 source meshes (test)' subset, measured by user preference scores. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | 2D Image Editing | | Dataset (including any stated split) | User Study 20 source meshes (test) | | Metric | Preference | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 2 of 2 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Preference](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Preference | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | APAP | 59.17 | Not recorded | 68fa72bd1e209131cea584d4 | | ARAP | 40.83 | Not recorded | 68fa72bd1e209131cea584d4 | ### APAP Preference: 59.17. Result ID: 699275913a6c3148490f18d6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ARAP Preference: 40.83. Result ID: 699275913a6c3148490f18d5. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.