# Class Geometry as Supervision for Sample-Efficient Open-World Detection Source: [Class Geometry as Supervision for Sample-Efficient Open-World Detection]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-08-15T05:00:01.149Z Authors: Akash Rao, Zhou Chen, Revanth Reddy Palem, Udhav Ramachandran, Ruth Scimeca, Sathyanarayanan N. Aakur Published: 2026-08-13T01:20:47.000Z ## Abstract Open-world object detection requires models to recognize known categories, reject unfamiliar objects, and incorporate new classes over time. This is especially challenging in scarce-data settings such as biomedical and scientific imaging, where rare categories may have only a few annotated examples and fine-grained classes differ by subtle morphology. Prototype-based detectors are natural for this regime, but they typically learn class prototypes as independent anchors, ignoring relational structure among classes. We propose class-geometry supervision (CGS), a general framework that constrains learned prototype or class-representation spaces to preserve visual or semantic class dissimilarities estimated from training data. CGS introduces a dissimilarity-preserving objective that aligns pairwise distances among learned class representations with a target class-geometry matrix while retaining the standard task loss. We instantiate the same objective across prototype recognition, few-shot biomedical object detection, open-set detection, novel-class insertion, and OWOD adaptation on COCO. Experiments show that CGS improves sample efficiency in recognition and ova detection, substantially strengthens novel-class insertion, and improves unknown recall on COCO while retaining much of the known-class detection performance. Ablations show that meaningful visual geometry provides the most reliable gains, while random geometry can help novel separation but is less consistent for few-shot detection. These results suggest that relational class geometry is an effective supervisory signal for building calibrated and extensible open-world detectors under limited supervision. ## Recorded benchmark results A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. ## Original sources and implementation [Original paper]() [PDF]()