# Rethinking Data Efficiency in Industrial Dense Prediction: Pretraining Coherence, Not Inductive Bias, Determines ViTs Low-Data Advantage

Source: [Rethinking Data Efficiency in Industrial Dense Prediction: Pretraining Coherence, Not Inductive Bias, Determines ViTs Low-Data Advantage](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a7bfe024b236a9bba1a1871>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-08-13T05:00:05.217Z

Authors: Haoran Sui, Yaoyuan Jia

Published: 2026-08-11T07:17:59.000Z

## Abstract

Vision Transformers (ViTs) are widely believed to require more labeled data than CNNs for industrial dense prediction. Through controlled experiments on four industrial datasets, we show that the data-efficiency gap stems from pretraining incoherence, which refers to the statistical mismatch between ImageNet-pretrained ViT backbones and COCO-pretrained CNN necks, rather than from inherent self-attention deficits. We characterize the cross-architecture feature gap and propose a lightweight AlignBlock family for pyramid-level feature recalibration. Our core finding empirically identifies a data-efficiency frontier: for domain-proximal scenes with \>= 200 samples, Swin-Graft surpasses YOLOv11x (terminal 703-shot: 0.973 vs 0.956 mAP@50); for domain-distant scenes, CNNs retain advantage (hook 141-shot: 0.900 vs 0.600 mAP@50). Grafted neck weights yield up to 2.5x the mAP of a randomly initialized neck.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10590>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.10590.pdf>)
