# MoPET: Parameter-Efficient Mixture-of-Experts for Unified Medical Image Classification

Source: [MoPET: Parameter-Efficient Mixture-of-Experts for Unified Medical Image Classification](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a7020a8ecc699bfe185c39f>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-08-05T05:00:18.080Z

Authors: Sebastian Doerrich, Daniel W\\"urtinger, Francesco Di Salvo, Shyam Nandan Rai, Christian Ledig

Published: 2026-07-31T14:28:23.000Z

## Abstract

Adapting deep learning models to profound clinical heterogeneity typically relies on parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) to avoid the severe overfitting associated with full end-to-end network updates. Although PEFT successfully navigates limited data scenarios, it inherently forces the training of a separate, isolated adapter for every specific diagnostic task. Consolidating these isolated adapters into a single generalist network risks negative transfer, as optimization gradients from conflicting visual domains interfere. To address this, we propose MoPET, a mixture-of-experts (MoE) method that uses a learned sparse router to direct each input through a small subset of low-rank PEFT experts injected into a frozen foundation model, sharing capacity across datasets while limiting cross-domain gradient conflict. Through selected evaluations on the MedMNIST benchmark, we first establish that PEFT outperforms full network updates, improving average accuracy from 86.50% to 88.97%. We then show that a single MoPET model consolidates four heterogeneous datasets into one network, improving average accuracy over the best isolated PEFT adapters (93.46% versus 92.83%). Finally, we show that co-training with auxiliary datasets improves accuracy on data-constrained clinical targets, raising average target accuracy over the strongest isolated adapter from 81.58% to 83.58%. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/sdoerrich97/mopet.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29462>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.29462.pdf>)
