# A Cost-Effective Multimodal LLM Reasoning Framework for Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series

Source: [A Cost-Effective Multimodal LLM Reasoning Framework for Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a69893eecc699bfe185a937>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-07-30T05:00:15.133Z

Authors: Frank Nie, Ethan B Liu, Yuan Zhu, Wei Fan, Jindong Han

Published: 2026-07-28T16:33:41.000Z

## Abstract

Question answering (QA) over irregular clinical time series (ICTS) plays a pivotal role in a wide range of healthcare applications. Although recent multimodal time-series large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise in general-purpose time-series QA, they remain poorly equipped to model the sparsity, asynchrony, and irregular sampling patterns of clinical observations. To fill this gap, we propose ClinPRISM, a cost-effective multimodal LLM reasoning framework for question answering over ICTS data. First, we devise an irregularity-aware multi-scale encoder to capture sparse clinical evidence at diverse temporal scales. Then, we propose a temporal evidence distiller to integrate representations across these scales and compress them into a small number of LLM-compatible tokens. Moreover, we introduce a progressive alignment strategy that sequentially aligns the irregular trajectories with the LLM's textual embedding space. To facilitate training, we construct 30,000 clinical time series paired with multi-scale descriptions, together with 41,000 instruction-tuning instances spanning 11 tasks. Using a 4-billion-parameter LLM backbone, ClinPRISM achieves state-of-the-art performance on the held-out evaluation benchmark while using only 16 time-series tokens and achieving an average inference latency of 0.15 seconds per question.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25947>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.25947.pdf>)
