# Breaking the Model Forgetting Cycle in Long-Incremental 3D Object Detection

Source: [Breaking the Model Forgetting Cycle in Long-Incremental 3D Object Detection](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a59b7323357e1fdcf27cde5>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-07-18T05:00:05.624Z

Authors: Peisheng Qian, Jie Xu, Xulei Yang, Na Zhao

Published: 2026-07-16T04:39:35.000Z

## Abstract

Incremental 3D object detection requires a detector to learn novel object classes while remembering previously learned ones over sequentially arriving data. Previous methods, primarily based on pseudo-labeling, perform reasonably in short-incremental stages but still suffer from severe model forgetting when dealing with long-incremental sequences. We investigate this failure and reveal a detrimental self-reinforcing cycle: data distribution shift of novel classes causes model forgetting on old classes, which further produces accumulated error in pseudo-labeling that exacerbates model degradation. To address this issue, we draw inspiration from the human learning process and propose the \\emph{Learning-Dynamics-driven Memory and Review} (LDMR) framework. LDMR monitors per-class detection quality at periodic training checkpoints and uses these learning-dynamics signals to drive two innovative mechanisms, namely (i) human-like intra-stage review that divides each incremental stage into multiple sub-stages' training and concentrates on remembering the most-forgotten objects, and (ii) scene-aware cross-stage memory evolution that evolves a memory bank to transfer knowledge between two consecutive stages by jointly considering scene learnability and diversity. Extensive experiments across multiple long-incremental protocols on indoor benchmarks SUN RGB-D and ScanNetV2 show that LDMR substantially mitigates the model forgetting and outperforms all baselines by a clear margin. Code is available at https://github.com/qianpeisheng/LDMR.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14560>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.14560.pdf>)
