# UMSS: Towards Unsupervised Multi-modal Semantic Segmentation Source: [UMSS: Towards Unsupervised Multi-modal Semantic Segmentation]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-07-16T05:00:01.138Z Authors: Haitian Zhang, Thai Duy Nguyen, Xiangyuan Wang, Mohan Liu, Lin Wang Published: 2026-07-14T05:44:29.000Z ## Abstract Multimodal semantic segmentation (MSS) is essential for robust perception in complex environments, yet its potential remains largely untapped because of the prohibitive cost of human annotations. While unsupervised semantic segmentation (USS) has achieved strong results on a single RGB modality, its naive extension to multimodal data is often hindered by fusion degradation. This occurs because, without explicit supervision, existing frameworks struggle to reconcile the heterogeneous structural patterns captured by different sensors and therefore fail to effectively exploit their complementary information. In this paper, we make the first attempt to address the novel problem of Unsupervised Multimodal Semantic Segmentation (UMSS), aiming to effectively exploit complementary sensor information in a fully label free setting. To this end, we propose UniM2 (Unified Multimodal), a novel framework built on DINOv3 that transforms conventional fusion methods into consistent performance gains. Our key idea is to learn a unified latent space driven by Cross Modal Correspondence Synergy (CMCS) to extract intrinsic shared semantic cues, bypassing the need for label guided adaptive fusion. To mitigate inherent intermodal conflicts, we introduce a Cross Modal Harmonizer (CMH) that designates RGB as a stable reference, effectively suppressing inconsistent relational supervision while guiding the model to exploit complementary structural features. Extensive experimental results on NYU Depth v2 and MFNet show that UniM2 improves mIoU by 6.4% and 9.8%, respectively, demonstrating clear advantages over existing frameworks for UMSS. ## Recorded benchmark results A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. ## Original sources and implementation [Original paper]() [PDF]()