# Efficient Tuning Before Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization for Stochastic Gradient Descent-optimized Models

Source: [Efficient Tuning Before Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization for Stochastic Gradient Descent-optimized Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a55c2ee32fb937314877ba3>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-07-22T05:00:21.499Z

Authors: Peng Xia, Junbiao Pang, Muhammad Ayub Sabir

Published: 2026-07-13T10:24:36.000Z

## Abstract

Post-training quantization (PTQ) compresses deep neural networks for deployment under limited memory and computational budgets. However, low-bit (i.e., 2-bit or 4-bit) PTQ often suffers from substantial performance degradation. Most existing PTQ methods operate on an unconstrained full-precision (FP) model and primarily address quantization errors through post-hoc reconstruction. We argue that low-bit PTQ accuracy is limited not only by post-quantization error minimization, but also by the quantization-error tolerance of a FP model itself. In this paper, we propose Efficient Tuning Before Quantization (ETBQ), a pre-conditioning tuning stage for Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)-optimized models before PTQ. During tuning, the FP model is optimized under perturbations sampled from the error distributions of weight and activation quantization, guiding the model toward a loss-landscape region that is less sensitive to the subsequent PTQ. Unlike QAT, ETBQ does not train a fake-quantized deployment model, which is computationally and memory intensive. Instead, ETBQ outputs a FP model that can be used by any PTQ backend. Experiments on CIFAR-100, Tiny-ImageNet, ImageNet, and Cityscapes provide consistent evidence that ETBQ improves low-bit PTQ across diverse tasks. Under W2A4 settings, e.g., ETBQ improves over naive PTQ by 2.14\\% top-1 accuracy on Tiny-ImageNet and by 5.80\\% mIoU on Cityscapes. Code is available at https://github.com/xpxpxp2001xpxpxp/ETBQ.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11359>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.11359.pdf>)
