# Integrating Large Language Models and Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Image Classification

Source: [Integrating Large Language Models and Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Image Classification](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a54712c32fb937314877042>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-07-14T05:00:01.589Z

Authors: Camila Piscioneri Magalh\\~aes, Lucas Pascotti Valem

Published: 2026-07-10T05:39:41.000Z

## Abstract

While the growing availability of image data has driven significant advances, labeling datasets remains costly and time-consuming. Therefore, semi-supervised approaches such as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), which learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, have emerged as a promising solution. One of the primary challenges in applying GCNs to image classification is graph construction, since, unlike in citation networks or similar domains, images typically do not come with a predefined structural representation. For visual data, most studies construct graphs based on the similarity between feature vectors from pretrained deep learning backbones, typically by employing kNN or reciprocal kNN algorithms. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capability in capturing high-level semantics, their integration with GCNs for image classification remains underexplored. Aiming to fill this gap, our approach uses a Vision Language Model (VLM) to generate textual image descriptions, which are then processed by an LLM to estimate semantic similarity scores between connected images. These scores guide the pruning of edges in kNN and reciprocal kNN graphs, filtering out semantically irrelevant neighbors. Experimental results reveal that leveraging LLMs for graph refinement can improve classification accuracy, particularly for kNN graphs and some backbones. The source code is publicly available at http://gcnllm.lucasvalem.com.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09104>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.09104.pdf>)
