# CFCamo: A Counterfactual Detect-or-Abstain Framework for Camouflaged Object Detection

Source: [CFCamo: A Counterfactual Detect-or-Abstain Framework for Camouflaged Object Detection](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2a40e6d33dfb23e783914e>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-12T05:00:05.419Z

Authors: Suhang Li, Osamu Yoshie, Yuya Ieiri

Published: 2026-05-28T20:14:17.000Z

## Abstract

Vision-language reinforcement learning has recently shown strong target-present localization for camouflaged object detection (COD). Yet localization is only one side of the decision: when the agent faces an ordinary image with no camouflaged target, will it still claim that a camouflaged object exists? Standard COD training and evaluation data are positive-only, so agents optimized under this setting can acquire an over-detect bias, a task-specific form of object hallucination that standard COD evaluation leaves unmeasured. To quantify this target-absent behavior, we construct Counterfactual COD (CF-COD), a paired benchmark that removes the camouflaged target from each held-out COD evaluation image while preserving a plausible background. CF-COD evaluates whether a model detects the target on the original image and abstains on the target-absent counterfactual, summarized by Pair Accuracy (PA). We further introduce CFCamo, a paired counterfactual framework for COD with abstention. For training, CFCamo optimizes a Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct agent with Counterfactual Sequence Policy Optimization (CSPO), which samples paired original-counterfactual rollouts and uses a Counterfactual Paired Reward (CPR) to couple original-image detection with counterfactual abstention. On CAMO-test, CFCamo improves S\_alpha by +3.7 pp over the prior RL-based COD baseline; across CF-COD, it reaches 80.0-90.8% PA. Ablations show that removing counterfactual coupling reduces PA to 1.4-5.2% despite strong target-present COD scores, showing that target-present evaluation alone does not characterize detect-or-abstain behavior. Overall, these results indicate that CFCamo improves COD agents by coupling target-present detection with target-absent abstention, rather than merely strengthening target-present localization. Code and data are available at https://github.com/suhang2000/CFCamo.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Camouflaged Object Detection on CAMO CF-COD paired benchmark (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/camouflaged-object-detection-on-camo-cf-cod-paired-benchmark-test.md>): Camouflaged Object Detection; CAMO CF-COD paired benchmark (test); Do Score: 88.8.

- [Camouflaged Object Detection on CHAMELEON CF-COD paired benchmark (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/camouflaged-object-detection-on-chameleon-cf-cod-paired-benchmark-test.md>): Camouflaged Object Detection; CHAMELEON CF-COD paired benchmark (test); Do: 93.4.

- [Camouflaged Object Detection on COD10K CF-COD (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/camouflaged-object-detection-on-cod10k-cf-cod-test.md>): Camouflaged Object Detection; COD10K CF-COD (test); Do Score: 94.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11231>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.11231.pdf>)
