# Can the Environment Speak for Itself? $T^{2}$-GRPO: A Turn-Trajectory Group Relative Policy Optimization for Caregiver Agents

Source: [Can the Environment Speak for Itself? $T^{2}$-GRPO: A Turn-Trajectory Group Relative Policy Optimization for Caregiver Agents](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7690966ade919bfb6d>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-10T05:01:35.776Z

Authors: Yutong Song, Jiang Wu, Pengfei Zhang, Wenjun Huang, Honghui Xu, Nikil Dutt, Amir M. Rahmani

Published: 2026-06-07T23:04:55.000Z

## Abstract

Optimizing large language models (LLMs) for long-horizon caregiver agents requires balancing delayed task objectives with immediate environment dynamics, such as patient distress and resistance. In dementia care, this balance is especially difficult: trajectory level rewards are too sparse for turn level credit assignment, while external LLM-based evaluators are costly and can misread fragmented or indirect patient responses. To address this issue, we propose \\textbf{T}urn-\\textbf{T}rajectory \\textbf{G}roup \\textbf{R}elative \\textbf{P}olicy \\textbf{O}ptimization (\\textbf{T$^{2}$-GRPO}), a framework that decouples caregiver RL into two normalized reward horizons and enforces safety through a binary hard veto. $T^2$-GRPO derives dense turn-level rewards directly from environment state transitions, measuring changes in patient distress and resistance from a frozen dementia patient simulator. These environment-grounded rewards are combined with trajectory-level evaluations through independent centered-rank normalization, which preserves heterogeneous reward signals and mitigates reward collapse. Extensive experiments on dementia caregivers show that T $^{2}$-GRPO outperforms competitive baselines, indicating a substantial improvement for emotionally sensitive caregiver scenarios that effectively handles immediate patient feedback, long-term care outcomes, and safety constraints.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Dementia Care Dialogue Evaluation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dementia-care-dialogue-evaluation.md>): Dementia care dialogue; Dementia care dialogue; GMCPQ: 0.86.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08875>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.08875.pdf>)
