# A Geometry-Aware Triplane Field Network for Vehicle Aerodynamic Prediction Source: [A Geometry-Aware Triplane Field Network for Vehicle Aerodynamic Prediction]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-06-10T05:00:46.690Z Authors: Kangkang Qi, Huiyu Yang, Keqi Ding, Yunpeng Wang, Yuntian Chen, Yuanwei Bin, Rikui Zhang, Jianchun Wang Published: 2026-06-05T16:25:09.000Z ## Abstract High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is crucial to vehicle aerodynamic analysis, but its cost still constrains early-stage design exploration. Machine-learning-based surface-field prediction offers a faster alternative if the model can efficiently capture both global flow context and local geometric detail. This work proposes a machine-learning-based method, named the geometry-aware triplane field network (GTF-Net), for vehicle aerodynamic pressure and wall shear stress prediction. GTF-Net constructs triplane features directly from sampled surface points through a shared multilayer perceptron (MLP) and smooth bilinear rasterization. The planes are then processed by a dual-stream backbone that combines adaptive Fourier neural operator (AFNO) spectral mixing with convolutional neural network (CNN) refinement, so long-range aerodynamic coupling and local geometry-induced variations are modeled in the same representation. At query stage, sampled triplane features are combined with vehicle-aligned directional coordinates, normal-projection features, and a voxel-based curvature proxy. GTF-Net is compared with Transolver, geometry-informed neural operator (GINO), and TripNet, a triplane-based surrogate model. GTF-Net improves the relative L2 error from the strongest baseline value of 0.157 to 0.145 for pressure prediction and from 0.237 to 0.226 for wall shear stress prediction. Ablation results show that AFNO mixing, local CNN refinement, and query-side geometric encoding each contribute to accuracy, supporting the proposed mechanism of combining structured triplane representation with explicit aerodynamic geometry cues. ## Recorded benchmark results A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. - [Surface Pressure Prediction on DrivAerNet++ (test)](): Surface Pressure Prediction; DrivAerNet++ (test); Relative L2 Error: 0.145. - [Wall Shear Stress Prediction on DrivAerNet++ (test)](): Wall Shear Stress Prediction; DrivAerNet++ (test); Relative L2 Error: 0.226. ## Original sources and implementation [Original paper]() [PDF]()