# Drifting Preference Optimization for One-Step Generative Models

Source: [Drifting Preference Optimization for One-Step Generative Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e6454dbd7150506f859f9>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-05T05:00:12.194Z

Authors: Zhou Jiang, Yandong Wen, Zhen Liu

Published: 2026-06-01T17:31:49.000Z

## Abstract

One-step text-to-image generators are attractive for deployment because they generate an image with a single forward pass, but preference finetuning them remains difficult: standard alignment methods often rely on policy likelihoods, denoising trajectories, differentiable reward gradients, or test-time optimization. We propose Drifting Preference Optimization (DrPO), an online preference-finetuning method for deterministic one-step generators. For each prompt, DrPO samples candidates from the current generator, ranks them with a target reward, and uses high- and low-scoring samples to synthesize a feature-space update direction. The update is a non-parametric dipole preference field plus a reference drift estimated from the frozen base generator, and is optimized through a detached feature-space regression target. The target reward is used only for ranking, so DrPO can train with large, black-box, or non-differentiable rewards while inference remains a single generator call. We evaluate DrPO on SD-Turbo and SDXL-Turbo with multiple target rewards and benchmarks, including HPSv3 and GenEval. DrPO improves alignment over reward-gradient-free one-step preference baselines and reduces HPSv3 training computation by $3.51\\times$ under the matched effective-batch setting by removing reward-model backpropagation. Initial offline experiments suggest that sample-based gradient synthesis can also be used beyond online reward ranking.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Text-to-Image Generation on Parti-Prompts](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-to-image-generation-on-parti-prompts.md>): Text-to-Image Generation; Parti-Prompts; PickScore: 23.71.

- [Text-to-image generation on Pick-a-Pic v2 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-to-image-generation-on-pick-a-pic-v2-test.md>): Text-to-Image Generation; Pick-a-Pic v2 (test); PickScore: 23.66.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02521>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.02521.pdf>)
