# Risk-aware Selective Prompting for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Vision-Language Models

Source: [Risk-aware Selective Prompting for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Vision-Language Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a17cc01dbd7150506f81241>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-29T05:00:05.519Z

Authors: Yuang Huang, Yafeng Zhang, Yu Zilan

Published: 2026-05-27T08:14:59.000Z

## Abstract

Prompt-based verification is widely used to mitigate hallucinations in large vision-language models (LVLMs), yet when it helps remains poorly understood. We systematically study verification prompting across two representative LVLM architectures and hallucination benchmarks, and find that it is a risk-bearing intervention: its corrections increase with input difficulty, while newly introduced errors persist across difficulty levels. As a result, always-on prompting helps on hard inputs but offers little benefit -- and can harm -- easier ones. Our analysis further shows that this behavior is associated with a conservative output shift. Verification prompts redistribute attention from visual tokens toward instruction tokens and induce a distinct middle-layer entropy pattern absent in a neutral-prompt control, suggesting instruction-conditioned attention redistribution rather than uniformly improved visual grounding. Motivated by this input-dependent risk, we propose Risk-aware Selective Prompting (RSP), a training-free approach that uses pre-generation uncertainty signals to trigger verification selectively. RSP mitigates the degradation of always-on prompting while preserving baseline performance, and reveals that effective selection signals vary across architectures.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Object Hallucination Detection on POPE random](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-hallucination-detection-on-pope-random.md>): Object Hallucination Detection; POPE (Random); F1 Score: 89.1.

- [Object Hallucination Detection on POPE popular](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-hallucination-detection-on-pope-popular.md>): Object Hallucination Detection; POPE Popular; F1 Score: 86.5.

- [Object Hallucination on POPE Adversarial](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-hallucination-on-pope-adversarial.md>): Object Hallucination; POPE Adversarial; Accuracy: not recorded.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28123>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.28123.pdf>)
